🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a rising number of nations are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our children's innocence". Legislation could be formalized soon.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "an tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to pass a proposal raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a similar action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended families to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding statement calling for a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is given. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the move does not enact binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a solid first step," stated a leading parliamentarian behind the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in strong data".

Previously, interest grew behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. However, the government committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have raised warnings. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after encountering disturbing platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when users become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for young users," said a influential peer.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, legislation is largely unfolding at the local government level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring under-14s from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting minors to one hour of social media time per day, with additional use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills mandating parental consent for minors to set up social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from some figures to follow the Australian path, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Outside of the West, further countries are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international bodies adopt a more nuanced tone. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

As this global debate evolves, the policies of this nation and several other countries indicate that policymakers internationally are no longer willing to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.